An appeal was filed under Section 100 CPC but was dismissed as not pressed after counsel filed a memo seeking to dismiss it.
Appeal dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022 BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
R.S.A NO.476 OF 2019 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
SRI PALANICHAAMI SINCE DECEASED REP. BY HIS LRs
BOTH ARE R/AT D.NO.18, 1ST STAGE, ACHARI COLONY, GAYATHRIPURAM, MYSURU-570 019.
... APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. MARUTHI PRASAD S.A. & SRI NAGARAJAPPA B, ADVOCATES)
AND:
2
MYSURU-570 019.
(SRI. K.SHASHIKANTH PRASAD, ADVOCATE FOR R-1; SMT.GEETHADEVI M.P., ADVOCATE FOR R-2)
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 12.09.2018 PASSED IN R.A.NO.221/2018 (OLD NO.92/2017) ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, MYSURU, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.04.2017 PASSED IN O.S.NO.967/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDL. I CIVIL JUDGE, MYSURU.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for appellants has filed a memo
seeking to dismiss the appeal as not pressed. Memo is taken on record.
3
dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/JUDGE
*alb/-
SRI PALANICHAAMI SINCE DECEASED REP. BY HIS LRs
SMT. PUTTA LAKSHMI
THE MYSURU CITY CORPORATION
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
