Smt. a.S.Shamala v. Sri Anil Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Karnataka disposed of a Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 397 Cr.P.C. The Court held that the petition abated because the sole respondent died, and the petitioner failed to bring legal representatives on record.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE Dr. JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.82 OF 2013
BETWEEN:
Smt. A.S.Shamala, W/o Suresh Babu, Aged about 47 years, R/at No.1695, 7th Main Road, 7th Cross, RPC Layout, Vijayanagar, Bangalore-560 040. .. Petitioner ( By Sri M.M.Swamy, Advocate )
AND:
Sri Anil Kumar, S/o Late Boranna, Aged about 61 years, R/at No.354, 12th Main Road, Dr. Rajkumar Road, 6th Cross, Rajajinagar, Bangalore-560 010. .. Respondent
( By Sri H.P.Leeladhar, Advocate )
This Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Section 397 of Cr.P.C. praying to call for the records in Crl.A.No.219/2012 made by the Fast Track-II, Bangalore City and C.C.No.34447/2006 made by the XXI Addl.Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore City and set aside the judgment dated 29.11.2012 passed in Crl.A.No.219/2012 made by the Fast Track-II, Bangalore City and also the judgment dated 06.03.2012 passed in C.C.No.34447/2006 made by the XXI
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a criminal revision petition abates upon the death of the sole respondent before leave to appeal or initiation of trial is decided?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Smt. A.S. Shamala
- respondent
Sri Anil Kumar
Coram
Dr. Justice H.B. Prabhakara Swamy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRL.RP/82/2013
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court