The High Court dismissed the Criminal Revision Petition due to the petitioner's failure to comply with office objections after repeated opportunities, citing non-prosecution of the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE Dr. JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.1299 OF 2021
BETWEEN:
K.NARENDRA KUMAR SHARMA S/O LATE P.K.P. SHARMA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS R/AT NO.39, JOHN BULL STREET VIVEKNAGAR BANGALORE-560 047.
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI.AKRAM PASHA K., ADVOCATE)
AND:
MR.RAMDIP KUMAR GUPTA S/O LATE T.P.GUPTA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/AT NO.77/6, 2ND FLOOR 7TH CROSS, ANEPALYA ADUGODI POST, BANGALORE-560 030
… RESPONDENT
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE HON'BLE CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE MAYOHALL (CCH-56), AT BANGALORE IN CRL.A.NO.25220/2018, DATED 03.03.2021 AND IN C.C.NO.53441/2015, DATED 11.09.2018 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE LVII ACMM, MAYOHALL, AT BANGALORE.
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.R.P.No.1299 /2021 2
ORDER
None appear either physically or through video
conference.
A perusal of the order sheet would go to show that in spite of granting sufficient opportunities of not less than four times, the petitioner has not complied the office objections. No reasons are forthcoming for non-compliance of office objections.
As such, the petition stands dismissed for
non-compliance of office objections as well for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
TL
K.NARENDRA KUMAR SHARMA
MR.RAMDIP KUMAR GUPTA
H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
