Petitioner filed a criminal petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for bail in a case involving offences under IPC and POCSO. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous since the Trial Court had already granted bail to the petitioner's co-accused.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION No.3152 OF 2021
BETWEEN:
SRI DEEPAK A.J. @ DEEPU @ KARTHIK S/O JAYANANDA, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS R/O KATTARIKATTE, MARGODU VILLAGE AND POST, MADIKERI TALUK, KODAGU-571252. …PETITIONER
(BY SRI C R GOPALASWAMY, ADVOCATE) AND:
(BY SRI VINAYAKA V.S., HCGP FOR R1)
2
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 439 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CR.NO.30/2020 OF KODAGU WOMEN POLICE STATION, KODAGU DISTRICT FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 363, 342, 376D, 376A R/W 34 OF IPC AND SECTIONS 4, 6 OF POCSO ACT.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petition has become infructuous since the Trial Court had
already granted bail to the petitioner/accused No.2.
Sd/JUDGE
DH
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the criminal petition for bail enlargement remains maintainable after the trial court granted bail to another co-accused.
Whether the petition should be dismissed as infructuous.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SRI DEEPIREDAK A.J.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
V.A.GURU
H.P. SANDESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
