Disposed
Ravikumar @ Kumar v. the State of Karnataka
Karnataka HCCRL.P/3020/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION No.3020 OF 2021
BETWEEN:
RAVIKUMAR @ KUMAR S/O SIDDASHETTY, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS R/AT HUNASENALU VILLAGE, NANJANAGUD TALUK MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 301. …PETITIONER (BY SRI VEERABHADRASWAMY H P, ADVOCATE) AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY SHO KAWALANDE POLICE STATION NANJANAGUD TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU - 560 001. ...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI VINAYAKA V.S., HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 439 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO RELEASE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN C.R NO.38/2021 REGISTERED BY KOLANDE POLICE STATION, MYSURU FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 504, 307 R/W 34 OF IPC.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
2
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petition has become infructuous since the Trial Court had
already granted bail to the petitioner/accused No.1.
counsel for the petitioner, petition is dismissed as having
become infructuous .
Sd/JUDGE
DH
1 provisions across 1 enactments
RAVIKUMAR @ KUMAR S/O SIDDASHETTY
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
H.P. SANDHASH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court