Hari Prasad @ Avinash v. State by
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal Petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for bail challenging a dacoity conviction. The court rejected the plea, noting the petitioner acted as the mastermind, caused injury to bystanders, and was recovered with a significant portion of the stolen money and gold.
What did the court decide?
Petition for bail dismissed; petitioner to remain in custody.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION No.7567 OF 2021
BETWEEN:
HARI PRASAD @ AVINASH S/O MUGGANNA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS OCC: LABOURER R/O: NEAR ANTHARAGHATTAMMA ARCH, KASHIPURA, SHIVAMOGGA-577204 PERMANENTLY RESIDING AT: G.MALLENAHALLI, TIPTUR TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572140. ..PETITIONER
(BY SRI.P.P.HEGDE, SENIOR COUNSEL ALONG WITH SRI.VENKATESH SOMAREDDI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
STATE BY SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, RURAL POLICE STATION, SHIVAMOGGA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU – 560 001. ..RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.KRISHNA KUMAR, HCGP)
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail in a dacoity case where he is alleged to be the mastermind?
Whether recovery of a large amount and gold articles from the scene negates the grounds for bail?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
HARI PRASAD @ AVINASH
- respondent
STATE
Coram
H.P. Sandesh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRL.P/7567/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court