Petitioner challenged refusal of bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. Court dismissed petition as infructuous since the Trial Court had already granted bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION No.3021 OF 2021
BETWEEN:
S/O EMEKA FRANK AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS NIGERIAN NATIONAL R/AT HOUSE NO.85, GROUND FLOOR FATHIMA HOUSE, 3RD MAIN ANAM ENCLAVE ASHWATH NAGARA THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD DR.SHIVARAM KARANTH POST BENGALURU - 560 077.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI K S VISWANATH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY SHO INDIRANAGAR POLICE STATION BENGALURU
2
REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGALURU - 560 001.
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI VINAYAKA.V.S., HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION FILED U/S.439 CR.P.C PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CR.NO.37/2021 OF INDIRANAGAR POLICE STATION, BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 8(c), 22(c) OF NDPS ACT AND SECTION 14 OF FOREIGNERS ACT.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petition has become infructuous since the Trial Court had already granted bail to the petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 2.
counsel for the petitioners, petition is dismissed as having
become infructuous .
Sd/JUDGE
DH
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the relevant criminal case.
Whether the petition became infructuous due to prior bail granted by the Trial Court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
CHUKWUEMEKA FRANK @ NELSON
AMSELAM CHIGOE UDEOHA @ LUCKY NWAEZE
STATE OF KARNATAKA
H.P. SANDESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
