Criminal petition for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner was absent on both listing dates despite the court adjourning the matter in ends of justice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.1842/2021
BETWEEN:
DODDEGOWDA A.T., S/O LATE THIMMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/O ARAKERE VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT, KARNATAKA-572 135. … PETITIONER
[BY SRI DINAKAR ASHOK KUMAR BRAHMAPPA., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)]
AND:
[BY SRI K.K. KRISHNA KUMAR, HCGP FOR R-1)
2
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CR.NO.123/2020 (SPL.C.NO.146/2020) REGISTERED BY KUNIGAL POLICE STATION, TUMAKURU, FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 498(A), 306, 304(B) READ WITH SECTION 34 OF IPC. AND SECTIONS 3 AND 4 OF DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT AND SECTION 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(1)(w), 3(2)(v) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
This matter was listed on 20.04.2021 and thereafter, again it was listed on 07.01.2022 and there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner in the morning session and also in the afternoon session. However, in the ends of justice, the matter was adjourned to today. Today also, there is no representation for the petitioner in the morning and also in the afternoon session.
Hence, the criminal petition is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
MD
1 provisions across 1 enactments
DODDEGOWDA A.T.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BHAGYAMMA
H.P. SANDESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
