In the High Court of Karnataka, this petition for bail was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner had no legal representation on the listed dates, and no counsel appeared to argue the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.1772/2021
BETWEEN:
SATHISH @ SATHYA @ KADUPPA, S/O LATE SHANKAR, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/AT 1ST MAIN, 7TH CROSS, NANDESHWARA BADAVANE, KADABAGERE GATE, THAVAREKERE, BENGALURU-560 029. … PETITIONER
[BY SRI ARUN G., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)]
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY SHO, J.P.NAGAR POLICE STATION, BENGALURU-560 078. REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU. … RESPONDENT
[BY SRI K.K. KRISHNA KUMAR, HCGP]
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CR.NO.735/2011 (C.C.NO.25643/2012) REGISTERED BY J.P.NAGAR POLICE STATION, BENGALURU, FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 380 OF IPC.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
2
O R D E R
This matter was listed on 07.01.2022 and there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner both in the morning session and in the afternoon session. However, in the ends of
justice, the matter was adjourned. Today also, there is no representation for the petitioner in the morning and also in the afternoon session.
Hence, the criminal petition is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
MD
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the criminal petition for bail should be allowed when there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
Whether the criminal petition can be dismissed for non-prosecution in the absence of the petitioner.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SATHISH @ SATHYA @ KADUPPA
STATE OF KARNATAKA
H.P. SANDESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
