High Court of Bengaluru heard a criminal revision petition filed under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. to set aside lower court convictions. The petitioners remained absent or sought time repeatedly. The court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.53/2015
BETWEEN
3 . ADI @ ADITYA BHAT, S/O S B BHAT AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/AT NO.44, 2ND MIAN, 2ND CROSS, BANASHANKARI III STAGE, BANGALORE-560 070.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI SHANKARAPPA S, ADVOCATE -ABSENT)
2
AND
STATE BY BANASHANKARI P S BANGALORE-560 070 REPRESENTED BY SPP HIGH COURT BUILDING BANGALORE-560 001.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI ROHIT B.J, HCGP)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION PASSED IN C.C.NO.4316/2002 BY THE JUDGMENT DTD. 27.01.2010 ON THE FILE OF III-ACMM COURT AT BENGALURU AND THE JUDGMENT OF CONFIRMATION BY APPELLATE COURT IN CRL.A.NO.213/2010 BY ITS JUDGMENT DTD. 23.12.2014 ON THE FILE OF PRESIDING OFFICER, FAST TRACK COURT-XIII, AT BENGALURU THE PETITIONERS MAY BE ACQUITTED.
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER
This Revision Petition is of the year 2015. The matter was admitted on 8.7.2015.
3
28.1.2021, 12.2.2021, 26.2.2021 and 26.3.2021. Consistently, the learned counsel for the Revision Petitioner remained absent or prayed for time.
Hence, the Revision Petition is dismissed for nonprosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
PL*
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Arun Kumar and Others
State
V. Shrishananda
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
