The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the Criminal Revision Petition filed in 2012 for non-prosecution, noting that despite three calls for representation, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.142/2012
BETWEEN
SRI THIMME GOWDA S/O MARI GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS R/A YEREHALLY VILLAGE KADUR TALUK CHIKMAGALORE DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
(By SRI DILRAJ ROHIT SEQUEIRA, ADVOCATE -ABSENT)
AND
THE STATE BY BIRUR POLICE REPRESENTED BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI ROHIT.B.J, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 AND 401 OF CR.P.C, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED:16.1.12 PASSED BY THE PRL. S.J., CHIKMAGALUR IN CRL.A.NO.107/09 AND ORDER DATED:9.6.09 PASSED BY THE I ADDL.C.J., (JR.DN.) AND JMFC, KADUR IN C.C.NO.1160/05.
2
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER
This Criminal Revision Petition is of the year 2012.
Despite, calling the case thrice, no representation on behalf of the Revision Petitioner. Hence, the Revision
Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
PL*
Sri Timme Gowda S/O Mari Gowda
The State
V. Srishananda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
