The High Court of Jharkhand rejected a bail application filed under the NDPS Act. The court noted the recovery of poppy straw exceeded commercial quantity and the prima facie case for contravention of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, thus rejecting the plea.
No order committing production or remand to be attached to this correspondence
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.9884 of 2023
Sukhram Munda @ Barla @ Barla Munda aged about 25 years son of Durga Munda resident of Village Marangdih, P.O. and P.S. Arki, District Khunti ..... … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand …. …. Opp. Party
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH CHAND
-----For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Chaturvedy, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, A.P.P. --------
13/08.08.2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for
the State.
(Subhash Chand, J.)
Rohit
-2-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in a major quantity drug case given the prima facie case and commercial quantity involved.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Sukhram Munda @ Barla @ Barla Munda
The State of Jharkhand
SUBHASH CHAND
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
