Bail application directed to be decided afresh by the Supreme Court was dismissed for non-prosecution as neither petitioner nor counsel appeared on multiple dates despite notice through the Jail Superintendent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.9271 of 2022
Anurag Kumar Pandit @ Anurag Kumar Das @ Annu Pandit @ Anurag Kumar, aged about 19 years, Son of Ramashish Pandit, Resident of Village Devi Nagar, PO Dumka, PS Dumka (M), District Dumka, at present resident of Village Keotpara, Purana Dumka, PO & PS Dumka (M), District Dumka (Jharkhand). ..... … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand …. …. Opp. Party --------
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH CHAND
-----For the Petitioner : None For the State : Mr. Naveen Kr. Ganju, APP --------
13/08.08.2024 No one appears on behalf of petitioner even in revised call.
the Jail Superintendent concerned. The same notice have been served and the report received from the Jail Superintendent concerned shows that the petitioner was asked to engage some advocate. Again on 01.08.2024, no one appeared on behalf of petitioner.
(Subhash Chand, J.)
RKM
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application should be decided afresh after the Apex Court set aside the earlier bail order, given the petitioner's non-appearance.
Anurag Kumar Pandit @ Anurag Kumar Das @ Annu Pandit @ Anurag Kumar
The State of Jharkhand
Subhash Chand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
