The petitioner withdrew the writ petition with liberty to file a proper civil suit in the competent civil court. The writ petition was allowed to be withdrawn accordingly.
Withdrawal of writ petition allowed with liberty to file a proper civil suit before the civil court with territorial pecuniary jurisdiction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 5899 of 2011
Syed Mumtaz Ahmad ... ... ... Petitioner
Versus
… … ... Respondents
CORAM: SRI SANJAYA KUMAR MISHRA, C.J. SRI ANANDA SEN, J.
--------For the Petitioner: Mr. Birendra Burman, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Rahul Saboo, G.P.-II Mr. Abhilash Kumar, A.C. to G.P.-II
06/Dated: 16.09.2023
Mr. Aman Dayal Singh, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Birendra Burman, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that the petitioner would like to withdraw the writ application with liberty to file a proper civil suit before the civil court having territorial pecuniary jurisdiction. A memo to that effect is filed, which shall form part of the record.
In that view of the matter, this writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid.
Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(Sanjaya Kumar Mishra, C.J.)
(Ananda Sen, J.)
APK/VK
Syed Mumtaz Ahmad
State of Jharkhand through Secretary, Drinking Water and Sanitation Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi
Sanjaya Kumar Mishra
Ananda Sen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
