Disposed

M/S Alok Stone Represented through Its Proprietor Alok Ranjan v. the State of Jharkhand through the Secretary Deptt of Mines and Geology

Jharkhand HC14 Sept 2023WPC/233/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought issuance of a writ directing the Mines Commissioner to dispose of a pending revision application. The court was informed that the revision had already been disposed of on merits, rendering the writ petition infructuous, and the matter was disposed of accordingly.

What the court decided

AI extract

M/S Alok Stone Represented through Its Proprietor Alok Ranjan Vs the State of Jharkhand through the Secretary Deptt of Mines and Geology — Jharkhand HC (2023) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 233 of 2023

¶2

M/S Alok Stone represented through its proprietor namely Alok Ranjan, aged about 42 Years, son of Late Bajrang Kumar Mishra, resident of Village Kasba, P.O. Kasba, Dudhichak, P.S. Mehrama, DistrictGodda (Jharkhand).

¶3

………. Petitioner

¶4

-Versus-

¶5

The State of Jharkhand, through the Secretary, Department of Mines and Geology, Government of Jharkhand having its office at Nepal House, Doranda, P.O. and P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi.

¶6

The Mines Commissioner, Department of Mines and Geology, Government of Jharkhand having its office at Nepal House, Doranda, P.O. and P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi.

¶7

The Deputy Commissioner, Sahibganj, P.O. and P.S. Sahibganj, District Sahibganj.

¶8

The District Mining Officer, Sahibganj, P.O. and P.S. Sahibganj, District Sahibganj.

¶9

…….. Respondents

¶10

¶11

CORAM: SRI SANJAYA KUMAR MISHRA, C.J. SRI ANANDA SEN, J.

¶12

¶13

For the Petitioner: Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Roy, A.C. to G.A.-III

¶14

¶15

04/Dated: 14.09.2023

¶16

In this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief:-

¶17

“For issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction, upon the Respondent No. 2 i.e. Miens Commissioner, Jharkhand, Ranchi to dispose of the revision application being Revision Case No. 46 of 2022 filed by the petitioner, pending since 11.10.2022.”

¶18

However, it is brought to our notice by the learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh that in the meantime the respondent No.2 – Mines Commissioner, Ranchi, has already considered and disposed of the Revision Case No.46 of 2022 on merits and hence, this writ petition has become infructuous which may be disposed of accordingly.

¶19

Ordered accordingly.

¶20

Pending Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand disposed of.

¶21

Urgent Certified copies as per rules.

¶22

(Sanjaya Kumar Mishra, C.J.)

¶23

(Ananda Sen, J.)

¶24

Manoj/R.S.

M/S Alok Stone Represented through Its Proprietor Alok Ranjan v. the State of Jharkhand through the Secretary Deptt of Mines and Geology

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

M/S Alok Stone Represented through Its Proprietor Alok Ranjan v. the State of Jharkhand through the Secretary Deptt of Mines and Geology

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tarapado Dhiwar Vs State of Jharkhand

Sarafraj Ahmad Vs State of Jharkhand

Sita Ram Munda Vs Shri Gopal Singh Central Coalfields Limited through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director

M/S Alok Stone Represented through Its Proprietor Alok Ranjan Vs the State of Jharkhand through the Secretary Deptt of Mines and Geology

Arun Kumar Dubey Vs the State of Jharkhand

Shri Arun Kumar Tiwari Vs the State of Jharkhand