Indu Kumari Choudhary Vs the Union of India through Its Secretary Department of Housing and Urban Development

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

W.P. (C) No. 1500 of 2021

Indu Kumari Choudhary, W/o. Late Shishir Kumar Choudhary, resident of Flat No.2AE-4 & 5, Vishnu Apartment, Williams Town, P.O. and P.S. Deoghar, District Deoghar.

¶4

... ... Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The Union of India through its Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development, having its office at Nirman Bhawan, Delhi, P.O. and P.S. Lodhi Road, District New Delhi.

¶7

The State of Jharkhand, through its Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagannathpur, District Ranchi.

¶8

The Chief Executive Officer, Deoghar Municipal Corporation, Deoghar, P.O. and P.S. Deoghar, District Deoghar.

¶9

… … ... Respondents

¶10

¶11

CORAM: SRI SANJAYA KUMAR MISHRA, C.J. SRI ANANDA SEN, J.

¶12

¶13

For the Petitioner: Mr. Aman Dayal Singh, Advocate For the UOI: Ms. Shreesha Sinha, A.C. to A.S.G.I. For the State: Mr. Ranjit Kumar A.C. to G.P.-IV For the Corporation: Mr. Vijay Shankar Jha, Advocate

¶14

¶15

06/Dated: 05.09.2023

¶16

Mr. Aman Dayal Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, would submit that the petitioner wants to withdraw this writ petition as the Appellate Authority has already decided the matter and nothing remains to be decided in this writ petition. A memo of withdrawal to that effect has been filed today which is taken on record.

¶17

Learned counsel appearing for the respondents does not have any objection to the aforesaid prayer.

¶18

Hence, this writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn.

¶19

There shall be no orders as to costs.

¶20

Pending Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand disposed of.

¶21

Urgent Certified copies as per Rules.

¶22

(Sanjaya Kumar Mishra, C.J.)

¶23

(Ananda Sen, J.)

¶24

Manoj/MM

Indu Kumari Choudhary v. the Union of India through Its Secretary Department of Housing and Urban Development

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Indu Kumari Choudhary v. the Union of India through Its Secretary Department of Housing and Urban Development

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yashaswi Construction through Its Partner Dharmender Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary

M/S Rajeev Singh and Company through His Proprietor Rajeev Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand through Secretary Department of Rural Development Jharkhand

M/S Pandav Ceramic Alias Refractories through Its Partner Sri Chandra Sekhar Prasad Singh Vs Ranchi Industrial Area Development Authority

Anuranjan Ashok Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ms Sparkle World Pvt. Ltd. Represented through Its Director Namely Anil Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ms Sparkle World Pvt. Ltd. Represented through Its Director Namely Anil Kumar Vs State of Jharkhand