Writ petition filed by a company was disposed of by the High Court of Jharkhand as infructuous because the petitioner's grievance had already been redressed per supplementary counter affidavit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (C) No. 1287 of 2023
M/s. Rajeev Singh & Company, through his proprietor, Rajeev Singh, aged about 46 years, S/o Late Prahlad Singh, R/o:- A 33, Yamuna Block, Siroman Nagar, Binda Apartment, Dimna Road, Mango, P.O. M.G.M. College, P.S.:- M.G.M. College, District East Singhbhum (Jharkhand)
... Petitioner
Versus
... Respondents
--------- CORAM: SRI SANJAYA KUMAR MISHRA, C.J. SRI ANANDA SEN, J.
--------For the Petitioner: Mr. Abhay Prakash, Advocate Mr. S. Bhaumik, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Manish Mishra, G.P.-V --------- 04/Dated: 04.09.2023
Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.
As per the statements given in paragraph 10, 11 and 12 of the supplementary counter affidavit, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed.
In that view of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of as being
infructuous.
Pending Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand disposed of.
Urgent Certified copies as per Rules.
(Sanjaya Kumar Mishra, C.J.)
(Ananda Sen, J.)
Manoj/MM
M/s. Rajeev Singh & Company
State of Jharkhand
Sanjaya Kumar Mishra
Ananda Sen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
