Appeal against a criminal order withdrawn by the appellant. The Court granted leave to withdraw the appeal and dismissed it accordingly.
Leave to withdraw the appeal was granted; the appeal stood dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No.310 of 2023
-----
Sabitri Karmkar, Aged about 50 years, W/o Rajendra Thakur, R/o Vill. Kalyanpur, Manjhitola, P.O. Lakhipur, P.S.-Ranga, District – Sahibganj. .… … Appellant Versus
The State of Jahrkhand … … Respondent -------
CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH CHAND
For the Appellant : Mr. Gautam Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Shailesh Kumar Sinha, A.P.P.
Order No. 02 / Dated 22nd March, 2023
After some argument, Mr. Gautam Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this appeal in order to search out remedy for redressal of his grievance.
Considering the submission made on behalf of the appellant, leave is granted.
Accordingly, the instant appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.
This order is passed in presence of Mr. Shailesh Kumar Sinha, learned A.P.P. for the State.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
(Subhash Chand, J.)
Birendra/
Sabitri Karmkar
The State of Jahrkhand
Sujit Narayan Prasad
Subhash Chand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
