In a contempt petition, the State submitted compliance with this Court's previous order. Finding no makeout for contempt, the judge disposed of the petition without assigning costs.
The contempt petition is dropped and disposed of as no contempt is made out.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (C). No. 234 of 2022
Chandana Tewary … … Petitioner
…….. Opp. Parties .
CORAM: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.N.PATHAK
For the Petitioner : Mr. Amit Kr. Tiwari, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Deepak Kr. Dubey, AC to AAG
08/ 03.02.2023 At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party-
State submits that order and direction of this Court has already been complied with.
In view of fair submission of learned counsel for the opposite parties, no contempt is made out against the opposite parties and hence, it is dropped.
Resultantly, the instant contempt petition stands disposed of.
(Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.)
RC/K
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the opposite parties are liable for contempt given compliance with previous court orders.
Chandana Tewary
State of Jharkhand
Sri Kiran Pasi
Sri Sachidanand Divendu Tigga
S.N. Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
