This single-paragraph order dismisses a contempt petition as no contempt is made out because the opposite parties had already complied with the court's previous order and directions.
The contempt petition is dropped as no contempt is made out. Pending I.A.s stand disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (C). No. 128 of 2020
Smt. Manju Devi … … Petitioner
…….. Opp. Parties .
CORAM: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.N.PATHAK
For the Petitioner : Mr. Saurabh Shekhar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Indranil Bhaduri, SC-IV Mr. Divyam, AC to SC-IV For the JAC : Mrs. Richa Sanchita, Advocate Mr. Radha Krishna Gupta, Advocate
11/ 03.02.2023 At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties submits that order and direction of this Court has already been complied with.
In view of fair submission of learned counsel for the opposite parties, no contempt is made out against the opposite parties and hence, it is dropped.
Resultantly, the instant contempt petition stands disposed of.
Pending I.A.s, if any, also stand disposed of.
(Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.)
RC/K
Smt. Manju Devi
The State of Jharkhand
Mr. Arvind Prasad Singh
Mr. Manish Kumar Singh
Dr. S.N. Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
