A contempt application was disposed of as the contemnor submitted that the earlier order of the court has been complied with, thus negating any claim of contempt.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 169 of 2019
Vijay Kumar Singh …. Petitioner
CORAM : HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE S.N. PATHAK
-----For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhishek Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Jha, AC to Sr.S.C.-II For the O.P. Nos. 3 & 4 : Mr. Chandan Tiwari, Advocate
In view of submission of learned counsel for the opposite parties, no contempt is made out and hence, it is dropped.
Accordingly, this contempt application stands disposed of.
R.Kr.
Vijay Kumar Singh
The State of Jharkhand
Smt. Suchitra Sinha
Shri Sushil Kumar
Shri Jitesh Kumar
S.N. Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
