Provisional bail granted to the petitioner earlier was confirmed based on supplementary affidavit stating settlement between parties and separate residence.
Provisional bail granted vide order dated 25.11.2022 was confirmed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B. A. No. 9546 of 2022
....
Mehtab Ansari .… Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Tabasum Khatoon .... Opposite Parties .... CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Petitioner : Mr. Pran Pranay, Adv. For the State : Mr. S.K.Dubey, A.P.P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Kamdeo Pandey, Adv. ....
06/02.03.2023 It appears that provisional bail has been granted to the applicant vide order dated 25.11.2022 and the matter has been referred to the DLSA, Giridih for mediation.
By filing supplementary affidavit, it has been submitted that the matter has been settled between the parties. Both the parties are residing separately and some money has also been transacted.
In view of above submission, provisional bail granted to the applicant vide order dated 25.11.2022 is, hereby, confirmed.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.)
Shahid/
Mehtab Ansari
The State of Jharkhand
Tabasum Khatoon
RAJESH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
