Allowed

Nageshwar Ganjhu v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC2 Mar 2023B.A./10213/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the release of the applicant on regular bail in a criminal case involving offences under sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 379, 385, 387 IPC and CmP Act, subject to bail bond and reporting conditions.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, Aadhaar and mobile submission, close relative as bailor, and monthly reporting.

Nageshwar Ganjhu Vs the State of Jharkhand — Bail and Remand | Jharkhand HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.10213 of 2022

¶2

Nageshwar Ganjhu … …Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand … …Opp. Party(s)

¶3

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR

¶4

--For the Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) : Mr. S.K. Pandey, Adv. For the State : Mr. S.K.Mahto, A.P.P. ---

¶5

05/02.03.2023: Heard the parties.

¶6

The applicant, who is in custody since 07.03.2022, has approached this Court for grant of regular bail.

¶7

The applicant is an accused of committing offence u/s 147, 148, 149, 323, 379, 385 and 387 IPC and Section 17 (i) (ii) of the C.L.A. Act.

¶8

It has been submitted by the counsel for the applicant(s) that complete set of FIR along with its enclosure have been annexed with this

¶9

bail application and there is no suppression on his/her part.

¶10

Innocence has been claimed and participation in the trial has been assured. It has been submitted that the applicant has been roped in on the basis of the confession of the co-accused. Till date, no TIP has been held. Charge has already been framed on 29.07.2022. On the above facts, prayer for bail has been made.

¶11

On the other hand, learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail and it has been submitted that the applicant has four criminal antecedents.

¶12

Considering the material available on the record and the period of custody, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant (s) on bail. Accordingly, the applicant(s), above named, is/are directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M., 1^st Class, Chatra, in connection with Pathalgadda P.S. Case No.42 of 2018 on the condition that the applicant(s) will submit self-attested photocopy of his/her/their Aadhaar Card and also submit his/her/their mobile number before the learned court below which he/she/they will always keep active and will not change it during pendency of this case without prior permission of the court. Further condition is that one of the bailors will be the close relative of the applicant (s) and he is directed to report once in a month before the concerned police station.

¶13

(Rajesh Kumar, J.)

¶14

Ravi/-

Nageshwar Ganjhu v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nageshwar Ganjhu v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanichar Tudu Alias Sanichar Manjhi Vs the State of Jharkhand

Rohit Kumar Nishad Alias Rohit Nishad Vs the State of Jharkhand

Laxman Kewat Alias Laxman Kumar Mallah Vs the State of Jharkhand

Kaira Chutiya Purti Vs the State of Jharkhand

Mehtab Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Rahul Mandal Alias Shyam Mandal Vs the State of Jharkhand