Patently disapproved of anticipatory bail application by a Branch Manager accused of misappropriating company funds. The Appellate Prosecutor submitted corroborating witness statements confirming the misappropriation of 16 lakh rupees.
Prayer for anticipatory bail stands rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A No. 755 of 2023
Nitesh Kumar Singh ----Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ----Opp. Party ---
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ambuj Nath
For the Petitioner: Mr. Pradeep Kr. Choubey, Advocate For the O.P-State: Mr. P.C. Sinha, A.P.P.
06 / 16.06.2023 Heard the parties.
(Ambuj Nath, J)
Ranjeet/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to a Branch Manager accused of misappropriating company funds amounting to Rs. 16,11,457.
Nitesh Kumar Singh
The State of Jharkhand
Ambuj Nath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
