Petitioner sought permission to withdraw an anticipatory bail application. Permission was allowed and the application was dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw anticipatory bail application allowed; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A No. 2099 of 2023
Arun Saw ----Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ----Opp. Party --CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ambuj Nath --For the Petitioner: Mr. Kripa Shankar Nanda, Advocate For the O.P-State: Mr. Satish Prasad, A.P.P.
--05 / 16.06.2023 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Prayer is allowed. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Ambuj Nath, J)
Ranjeet/
Arun Saw
The State of Jharkhand
Ambuj Nath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
