The applicant, in custody for an NDPS offence involving drug possession, sought regular bail. The High Court rejected the fresh prayer holding that since all prosecution witnesses had been examined, there was no occasion to reconsider the earlier rejection.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4509 of 2023
Ramesh Nath … …Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand … …Opp. Party(s) ---
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
--For the Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) : Mr. Lalit Yadav, Adv. For the State : Mr. P. Chatterjee, A.P.P. ---
07/13.10.2023: Heard the parties.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.)
Ravi/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should reconsider the prayer for regular bail when all witnesses have been examined in a prosecution stage case.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ramesh Nath
Rajesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
