The Hon'ble High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi considered a bail plea filed by accused persons charged with gang rape. The Court, deeming the specific allegations against the petitioners too grave, declined to grant bail, thereby rejecting the plea.
Bail to the petitioners was rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B. A. No. 9812 of 2022
1.Sangram Murmu @ Kotrak Murmu
… … Petitioners 2.Somay Hembrom
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party ---
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
For the Petitioners : Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mrs. Kumari Rashmi, A.P.P.
5/14.11.2022 Heard the parties.
Defects as pointed out by the office are ignored.
The petitioners are accused in connection with Tinpahar P.S. Case
No. 52 of 2022.
It has been alleged that the daughter of the informant was subjected to gang rape by the petitioners.
Regard being had to the specific nature of allegations levelled against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners and the same is hereby rejected.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J)
R. Shekhar Cp 3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioners accused of gang rape of the informant's daughter.
Whether the specific nature of allegations against the petitioners warrants a denial of bail.
Sangram Murmu @ Kotrak Murmu
Somay Hembrom
The State of Jharkhand
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court