Petitioner sought bail alleging false implication. Bench noted co-accused bail and antecedents. Ordered release on bail with sureties and reporting conditions.
Petitioner released on bail on executing bonds of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of like amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 6755 of 2022
Sandeep Yadav @ Kaila Yadav @ Kail ... Petitioner
-VersusThe State of Jharkhand … ... Opposite Party
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RATNAKER BHENGRA
For the Petitioner :- Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Satish Prasad, APP
06/02.09.2022: Heard both the counsels.
The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. The learned counsel has further submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The learned counsel has further submitted that the co-accused, namely, Madan Yadav in BA No.6784 of 2022 and Abhay Yadav @ Sakendra Yadav in BA No.8352 of 2022 have been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 22.08.2022 and 25.08.2022 respectively. Therefore, the case of the petitioner stands of similar footing. Moreover, the petitioner is in custody since 27.01.2022. Therefore, petitioner may be released on bail.
Learned APP, appearing on behalf of the State, has opposed the bail application of the petitioner and has submitted that the petitioner has many criminal antecedents but does not dispute the cited bail orders.
Having gone through the records of the case and the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for both the sides, present petitioner, named above, is ordered to be released on bail on executing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM, Palamau at Daltonganj, in connection with Ramgarh PS Case No. 08 of 2022, corresponding to GR Case No.613 of 2022, subject to the conditions that (i) the petitioner shall report to the concerned police station on last Saturday of every month between 1:00 PM and 5:00 PM in the next twelve months, failing which his bail bonds shall be cancelled. Any exemption to such attendance shall be done so after direction from the learned Court below (ii) the
petitioner shall also remain present on each and every date of trial before the learned Court below unless dispensed with by the learned Court below and (iii) the petitioner will submit self-attested copy of his Aadhaar Card and also give his mobile number before the learned Court below which he will not change during pendency of this case without prior permission of the Court.
(Ratnaker Bhengra, J.)
S.B.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be released on bail considering co-accused bail and antecedents.
Whether the petitioner's claim of false implication should be accepted for bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sandeep Yadav @ Kaila Yadav @ Kail
The State of Jharkhand
Ratnaker Bhengra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
