Allowed

Soma Mahli v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC8 Aug 2022A.B.A./2372/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Jharkhand allowed an application for anticipatory bail. The petitioners sought protection while apprehending arrest in a case involving offenses under the Indian Penal Code and the Disaster Management Act, arguing the offenses were bailable.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed; release on bail upon arrest/surrender subject to bond of Rs. 25,000 each with sureties and conditions.

Soma Mahli Vs the State of Jharkhand — Bail and Remand | Jharkhand HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶2

A. B. A. No. 2372 of 2022

¶3

¶4

Dolka Mahli @ Soma Mahli

¶5

Bargi Mahli

¶6

Muchiroy Munda

¶7

Jagaay Pahan

¶8

Vijay Tuti

¶9

Sunil Tuti

¶10

Leda Munda

¶11

Mansukh Munda

¶12

Bhanu Muda @ Banu Munda @ Bhanu Munda

¶13

Niyaran Tuti @ Nag

¶14

Dubuyu Pahan

¶15

Harinandan Munda @ Hathiram Munda

¶16

Manga Munda 14. Manu Tuti @ Manu Baldev Tuti 15. Parta Munda @ Tuti

¶17

Emanuel Tuti 17. Birsa Nag @ Amus Nag … …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … …. Opp. Party

¶18

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶19

----For the Petitioners : Mr. S. Gautam, Advocate For the State : Mr. Nawin Kr. Singh, A.P.P. -----

¶20

Oral Order

¶21

06 / Dated : 08.08.2022

¶22

Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners above named have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Maranghada P.S. Case No. 26 of 2021 registered under Sections 147, 149, 188, 269, 270, 109, 353 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 51 of Disaster Management Act.

¶23

Heard the parties.

¶24

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that all the offences are bailable except Section 353 of IPC which will not be made out in the present case. The FIR does not disclose that the mob had resorted to violence and injury to anyone.

¶25

The Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail.

¶26

Considering the submissions of learned counsel and the fact as discussed above, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. Hence, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of two weeks from the date of this order, the petitioners named above shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

¶27

The petitioners will cooperate in the investigation and will appear on notice under Section 41A of Cr. P.C.

¶28

(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J . )

¶29

AKT

Soma Mahli v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Soma Mahli v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Javed Hussain Alias MD Javed Hussain Vs the State of Jharkhand

Mahesh Das Vs the State of Jharkhand

Jay Prakash Prasad Vs the State of Jharkhand

Mohammad Sikandar Ali Alias MD Sikandar Ali Vs the State of Jharkhand

Vijay Thakur Alias Vijay Kumar Thakur Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ashok Chandra Majhi Vs the State of Jharkhand