The High Court of Jharkhand heard a PIL regarding petroleum and food supplies. The writ petitioner sought to withdraw the application, which the respondents opposed. The court granted leave to withdraw and dismissed the writ application as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (PIL) No. 778 of 2021
Satyanarayan Yadav
…. … Petitioner
Versus
Petroleum Planning and Analysis Cell, New Delhi.
Deptt. Of Petroleum & Natural Gas Ministry,
Govt. of India, New Delhi.
CORAM : HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajeeva Sharma, Sr. Advocate Mr. Vijay Ranjan Sinha, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Sharad Kaushal, A.C to AAG-III For the UOI : Mr. Niraj Kumar, J.C to ASGI.
Oral Order 04/ Dated 23.09.2021
After some argument, learned senior counsel appearing for the
writ petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this application.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondents do not have any
objection to that.
In the result, this writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, C.J.)
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
DS/APK
Satyanarayan Yadav
The Union of India
The Director General, Petroleum Planning and Analysis Cell
The Secretary cum Administrator, Deptt. Of Petroleum & Natural Gas Ministry
The Director, Marketing, IOCL
The State of Jharkhand through Deptt. Of Food & Civil Supplies
Sujit Narayan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
