Dismissed

Cecon Pollutech Systems Pvt. Ltd. through Authorized Signatory Cum Director S K Chadha v. the State of Jharkhand through Chief Secretary

Jharkhand HC24 Sept 2021LPA/98/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed an appeal withdrawn with liberty to move before the forum mentioned in clause 13 of the contract, upon the State's consent and no objection.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the relevant forum under clause 13 of the contract.

What the court decided

Cecon Pollutech Systems Pvt. Ltd. through Authorized… — Company and Corporate | Jharkhand HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶2

L. P. A. No. 98 of 2021

¶3

Cecon Pollutech Systems Pvt. Ltd. through authorized signatory cum Director S.K. Chadha, aged about 69 years S/o Sri D.R. Chadha, R/o 2/113 Vijay Khand, Gomtinagar, PO & PSGomtinagar, Distt.-Lucknow (Uttar Pradesh).

¶4

.... …. Appellant

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Jharkhand through Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand at Project Bhawan, PO & PS-Dhurwa, Distt.-Ranchi.

¶7

The Secretary, Forest & Environment, Government of Jharkhand, Van Bhawan, PO & PS-Doranda, Distt.-Ranchi.

¶8

The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Van Bhawan, PO & PS-Doranda, Distt.-Ranchi.

¶9

The Chief Conservator of Forests & Director, Bhagwan Birsa Biological Park, Van Bhawan, PO&PS-Doranda, Distt.-Ranchi.

¶10

The Member Secretary, Jharkhand Zoo Authority, Van Bhawan, PO & PS-Doranda, Distt.-Ranchi.

¶11

The Range Officer, Bhagwan Birsa Biological Park, Van Bhawan, PO & PS-Doranda, Distt.-Ranchi.

¶12

.... .... Respondents

¶13

¶14

CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD

¶15

-----For the Appellant : Mr. Nikhil Ranjan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Piyush Chitresh, A.C. to A.G.

¶16

Oral Order

¶17

04 / Dated : 24.09.2021

¶18

With consent of the parties, hearing of the matter has been done through video conferencing and there is no complaint whatsoever regarding audio and visual quality.

¶19

After some argument learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave to withdraw this appeal with a liberty to move before the forum which would be available to him in law, as per clause 13 of the contract

¶20

¶21

agreement, to which learned counsel appearing for the State does not

¶22

have any objection.

¶23

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the

¶24

aforesaid liberty granted to the appellant.

¶25

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, C.J . )

¶26

(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)

¶27

Raman/AKT

Cecon Pollutech Systems Pvt. Ltd. through Authorized Signatory Cum Director S K Chadha v. the State of Jharkhand through Chief Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Cecon Pollutech Systems Pvt. Ltd. through Authorized Signatory Cum Director S K Chadha v. the State of Jharkhand through Chief Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pulis Hansda Vs the State of Jharkhand

Suresh Kumar Agarwal Vs the State of Jharkhand through Its Chief Secretary

Satyanarayan Yadav Vs the Union of India

Renuka Tiwary Vs the State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary

Jageshwar Sahu Vs the State of Jharkhand

Court on Its Own Motion Vs the State of Jharkhand