Subrata Kumar Chakraborty v. Ms Tisco Limited Now Known as Tata Steel Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L. P. A .…
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L. P. A .…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
L. P. A. No. 196 of 2020
with
I.A. No. 3438 of 2020
Subrata Kumar Chakraborty, aged about 54 years, S/o Late M.L. Chakraborty, R/o Village-Kayadanga, PO & PS-Kalyangarh, Distt.-24 Paragana (North), West Bengal
.... …. Appellant
Versus
M/s Tisco Limited (now known as Tata Steel Limited), a Company incorporated under the Companies Act, having its office and Works at Bistupur, PO & PS-Bistupur, Jamshedpur, Distt.-East Singhbhum.
.... Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
-----For the Appellant : Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Manish Mishra, Advocate
Ms. Varsha Ramsisaria, Advocate
Oral Order
05 / Dated : 22.09.2021
Heard the parties.
It is urged on behalf of the appellant that in view of the fact that
the appellant has sought and granted voluntary retirement, he would not be pursuing this appeal any further.
In the result, this appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
Consequent thereto, I.A. No. 3438 of 2020 stands disposed of.
(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, C.J . )
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
Raman/AKT
Subrata Kumar Chakraborty
M/s Tisco Limited
Sujit Narayan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court