The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the instant writ petition application as not pressed by the petitioner, granting the prayer vacuously while stating the substantive application was dismissed.
The prayer was allowed but the writ application was dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(S) No. 1883 of 2009
Dr. Mahesh Kumar Agrawal ..… Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Ors. ..... Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--------For the Petitioner : Mr. Altaf Hussain, Advocate For the Respondents : Vikash Kumar, CGC
(Deepak Roshan, J.)
Pramanik/
Dr. Mahesh Kumar Agrawal
Union of India
Deepak Roshan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
