Common order disposing of two writ petitions seeking quashing of dismissal orders. The court directed reinstatement of petitioners and a fresh decision by authorities following a specific prior judgment.
Directing respondents to reinstate petitioners and take a fresh decision in the light of cited judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 7677 of 2011
Vincent Dhan ..… Petitioner
Versus
W.P.(S) No. 7716 of 2011
Anil Kumar ..… Petitioner
Versus
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
For the Petitioners : Mr. Ranjan Kr. Singh, Advocate Mr. Manoj Kr. Ram, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Rahul Saboo, S.C-I ---------
09/Dated: 2nd February, 2021
Heard learned counsel for the parties through V.C.
2. With consent of the parties both these writ applications are taken up together and disposed of by this common order.
3. In both these writ applications, petitioners has prayed for quashing and setting aside order dated 06.03.2010 passed by the Disciplinary Authority and the order dated 08.07.2010 passed by the Appellate Authority
2
whereby and whereunder the respondent authorities have passed the order of dismissal from service against the petitioners.
4. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Mr. Rahul Saboo, learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that the issue involved in these writ applications are squarely covered by the judgment passed by this Court in L.P.A. No. 772 of 2015 (Satish Kumar Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Ors.), as such both parties jointly prayed that the instant writ applications may be disposed of by directing the respondent-authorities to pass a fresh order in the light of judgment passed by this Court in L.P.A. No. 772 of 2015.
5. In view of the aforesaid submissions of the rival parties both these writ applications are hereby disposed of by directing the respondents to reinstate the petitioners and take a fresh decision in the light of judgment passed by this Court in L.P.A. No. 772 of 2015.
6. With the aforesaid observations, both these writ applications are, hereby, disposed of. The pending I.A. also stands disposed of.
(Deepak Roshan, J.)
Amardeep/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether petitioners dismissed from service should be reinstated in light of the judgment in Satish Kumar Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Ors.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satish Kumar Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Ors.Relied on¶4
L.P.A. No. 772 of 2015 (Satish Kumar Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Ors.)
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Vincent Dhan
Anil Kumar
State of Jharkhand
Director General of Police, Jharkhand
Inspector General of Police, Jharkhand
Deputy Inspector General of Police, Coal Range
Deepak Roshan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court