Petitioner filed a contempt petition for non-compliance of an order regarding salary payment. The show cause return revealed the order was complied, and salary was paid. The court allowed the petitioner to claim interest separately. The contempt proceeding was dropped with liberty.
Contempt proceeding dropped with liberty to claim interest separately.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (C) No.190 of 2020
Narain Prasad …..Petitioner
Versus
Coram: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
----For the Petitioner : Md. Mokhtar Khan, Advocate For the State : Manoj Kumar, Advocate
The matter was taken up through Video Conferencing. Learned counsel for the parties had no objections with it and submitted that the audio and video qualities are good.
has been complied and the salary for the due period has been paid.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled for
the interest of the due amount.
The petitioner is at liberty to claim the interest amount by filing appropriate petition before an appropriate forum.
With the aforesaid liberty, this contempt proceeding is dropped.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.)
Ravi/-
Narain Prasad
Director, Primary Education, H.R.D. Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi
Rajesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
