The High Court of Jharkhand allowed the appellant to withdraw the criminal appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, though regular bail was left to be decided on merits. (2 paragraphs)
Permission to withdraw the criminal appeal is accorded; the appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Criminal Appeal (S.J.) No.130 of 2020
---
Anup Kumar Jha … … Appellant Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Ruby Sankrityayan … … Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
--- For the Appellant : Mr. Madhav Prasad, Adv. For the State : Mr. V.S. Sahay, A.P.P. ---
The matter was taken up through Video Conferencing. Learned counsel for the parties had no objections with it and submitted that the audio and video qualities are good.
---
07/06.07.2021: After some arguments, learned counsel for the appellant seeks
permission to withdraw the present appeal.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the present appeal being Criminal Appeal (S.J.)
No.130 of 2020 is dismissed as withdrawn.
However, if the appellant surrenders and prays for regular bail, the court below will decide it on its own merit without being prejudiced to the withdrawal order.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.)
Amar/-
Anup Kumar Jha
The State of Jharkhand
Ruby Sankrityayan
Rajesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
