K Sahul Hamid v. the State of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner, accused of cheating and forgery involving the misappropriation of bank funds via forged loan documents, applied for bail. The court rejected the bail application, citing the nature of allegations and the petitioner's admission in a confessional statement.
What did the court decide?
Bail application rejected; petitioner remains in custody.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B. A. No. 8719 of 2020
....
K. Sahul Hamid
.… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. Binod Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, A. P. P.
The matter was taken up through Video Conferencing. Learned counsel for the parties had no objection with it and submitted that the audio and video qualities are good.
03/18.03.2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner is accused in connection with Jadugora P. S. Case No. 40 of 2019 registered under Sections 406/419/420/467/468/471/34 of the Indian Penal Code and is pending in the Court of learned A.C.J.M., Ghatsila.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail having been accused of offences against property involving fraud and misappropriation of bank funds.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K. Sahul Hamid
- respondent
The State of Jharkhand
Coram
RAJESH KUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Jharkhand HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- B.A./8719/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court