Single judge order restoring an Application for Bail and Anticipatory Bail (A.B.A. No. 4630 of 2019) which was previously dismissed for non-compliance of an earlier order.
Application No. 4630 of 2019 restored to its original file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 601 of 2020
Santosh Munda @ Nago … … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
For the Petitioner : Mr. K. K. Singh, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Suchendra Prasad, A.P.P.
03/17.06.2020 Defects are ignored.
Heard Mr. K. K. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Suchendra Prasad, learned A.P.P. for the State.
This application has been preferred by the petitioner for restoration of A.B.A. No. 4630 of 2019 which was dismissed for non-compliance of the order dated 06.09.2019.
Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in the instant application, the same is allowed and A.B.A. No. 4630 of 2019 is restored to its original file.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.)
Umesh/-
Santosh Munda @ Nago
The State of Jharkhand
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
