The High Court of Jharkhand allowed the petitioner's request to withdraw an application dated 16 June 2020. The application was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw is accorded. Application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1233 of 2020
Vijay Dangi .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY Through Video Conferencing
--For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ram Prakash Singh, A.P.P. ---
Order No. 04 Dated 16th June 2020
Heard the learned counsel for the respective sides.
Defects, as pointed out by the office, are ignored.
Mr. Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset
seeks permission to withdraw this application.
Permission is accorded.
This application is dismissed as withdrawn.
MK
Vijay Dangi
The State of Jharkhand
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
