Pankaj Kumar v. the State of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
In a bail application, the petitioner alleged that a fresh ground existed as he has been in custody since May 20, 2019. The court rejected the bail request but directed the trial court to conclude the trial within four months.
What did the court decide?
Bail application rejected with a direction to conclude trial within four months.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B. A. No. 3281 of 2020
Pankaj Kumar … … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
For the Petitioner : Mr. R. S. Mazumdar, Senior Advocate For the Opposite Party : A.P.P.
2/01.07.2020 Heard the parties.
The petitioner is an accused in connection with Jorapokhar P.S. Case No. 16 of 2019.
The prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected in B. A. No. 7354 of 2019.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner who is an accused in connection with Jorapokhar P.S. Case No. 16 of 2019.
Whether the delay in trial justifies a fresh reconsideration of the bail prayer after a previous rejection.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Pankaj Kumar
- respondent
The State of Jharkhand
Coram
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Jharkhand HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- B.A./3281/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court