Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the application. The court granted permission and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the application was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 2630 of 2020
Rasid Ansari. …..Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. …..Opposite Party -------Coram: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY -------For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Prabir Chatterjee, Special P.P. --------
02/11-08-2020 Heard the parties.
Defects, as pointed out by the office, are ignored. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this
application.
Learned Special P.P. does not have any objection.
Permission as sought for is granted.
This application is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J)
Rakesh/-
Rasid Ansari
The State of Jharkhand
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
