This is a brief order dismissing an anticipatory bail application as not maintainable on the ground that a process u/s 82 Cr.P.C. had already been issued in the matter.
None. Application dismissed as not maintainable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 1987 of 2020
Vivek Kumar Rajak ..... Petitioner Vs. 1. The State of Jharkhand .... 2. Ashok Kumar Singh Opposite Parties --CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY Through Video Conferencing --For the Petitioner : Mr. D. K. Karamkar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jitendra Pandey P.P. --- Order No. 03 Dated 10th August, 2020
The defect No. 9(i), as pointed out by the office, is ignored. Mr. D. K. Karamkar, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits relaying on the counter affidavit that process u/s 82 Cr.P.C. has already been issued.
In such view of the matter, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as being not maintainable.
(RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY,J.)
MK
1 issue framed by the court
The application for anticipatory bail was found to be not maintainable because a process u/s 82 Cr.P.C. had already been issued.
Vivek Kumar Rajak
The State of Jharkhand
Ashok Kumar Singh
RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
