The anticipatory bail application filed by the petitioner was heard, and upon counsel's request for permission to withdraw, the court dismissed the application as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.1627 of 2019
Devendra Mehta @ Devendra Kumar Mehta …… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand ….. Opp. Party
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA
--------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Arpit Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Anup Topno, A.P.P. ---------
03/Dated: 03rd October, 2020
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P., are present.
2. Learned counsel, on the instruction of the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the present application.
3. Heard. In view of the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the anticipatory bail application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(AMITAV K. GUPTA, J.)
Chandan/-
Devendra Mehta @ Devendra Kumar Mehta
The State of Jharkhand
Amitav K. Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
