The High Court of Jharkhand rejected the petitioner's bail application. The court found no reason to disturb the earlier order rejecting bail due to spot apprehension and serious allegations, while directing the trial court to expedite the proceedings.
Bail application rejected; trial directed to be expedited.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B. A. No. 10816 of 2019
MD Amanullah @ MD Aman Ansari @ Amanullah … … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand. … … Opp. Party
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
03/10.01.2020
2
progress, he has no objection if any observation is made regarding expediting the trial of the petitioner.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)
Mukul/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner who is in custody for alleged offences under Section 395 IPC and Explosive Substance Act.
Whether the trial should be expedited given the delay in the proceedings.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Md Amanullah
The State of Jharkhand
Anubha Rawat Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
