The petitioner sought permission to withdraw her writ petition, which was granted. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(C) No. 3073 of 2015
---Julee Kumari. ... . Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand & Others .....Respondents ----
Coram: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY ---------For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kumar Sah, Advocate For the JAC : Mrs. Richa Sanchita, Advocate
05/2.8.2019 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition.
Permission, as sought for, is granted.
This writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay,J)
Rakesh/-
Julee Kumari
The State of Jharkhand
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
