The writ application was dismissed as infructuous on the application of the petitioner's counsel, who submitted that the writ could no longer be pursued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W. P. (C) No. 2561 of 2010
Parmeshwar Mahto
… … Petitioner
Versus
… … Respondents ---
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sinha, Advocate : For the Respondents
3/01.08.2019 Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ application has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the same is dismissed as being infructuous.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J)
R Shekhar Cp 2
Parmeshwar Mahto
The State of Jharkhand
The Dy. Commissioner, Dhanbad
The Circle Officer, Baghmara Circle, Dhanbad
The Block Development Officr, Baghmara, Dhanbad
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court