Anil Kumar And Ors. v. Vinoba Bhave University And Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed as it was abandoned due to lack of instructions from the petione
Writ petition dismissed as it was abandoned due to lack of instructions from the petione
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (S) No. 2716 of 2009
...
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. Samavesh Bhanj Deo, Adv. For the Resp.-University : Mrs. I. Sen Choudhary, Adv.
06/22.04.2019 It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that in spite of best efforts made, he could not get instruction from his client.
Learned counsel for the respondent-University is present.
In view of the above fact, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want of instruction.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.)
Kamlesh/
Anil Kumar
Md. Rahat Hussain
Manish Kumar
Vinoba Bhave University Hazaribagh
R. S. P. College, Jharia
Rajesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court