The petitioner failed to appear on the second hearing date despite a notice to press the case. The court dismissed the writ petition for non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (S) No. 1366 of 2009
...
Kapildeo Yadav
...... .....Petitioner
Vrs.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
For the Petitioner : None. For the Resp. –State : Mr. S. Bhowmik, AC to SC-III (Mines)
07/16.04.2019 Nobody appears for the petitioner. However, learned counsel for
the respondent-State is present.
Last order dated 28.03.2019 reads as under:
“Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State, Ms. Bharti Kumari (AC to SC-III) is present.
With a view to give one more chance to the petitioner, put up this case on 16.04.2019. If on the next date, this case is not pressed, the same may be dismissed”
Since, today also nobody appears for the petitioner, the instant
petition is dismissed for non appearance.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.)
Kamlesh/
Kapildeo Yadav
The State of Jharkhand through Secretary, Department of Home (Police), Jharkhand, Ranchi
Rajesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
