The single judge permitted the appellant to withdraw the criminal appeal following his death during the pendency of the proceedings. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the appeal is accorded; appeal dismissed as withdrawn; pending I.A. disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Criminal Appeal (S.J.) No. 975 of 2015
… … Keshav Narayan Banerjee Appellant
Versus
… The State of Jharkhand through Vigilance … Respondent ---
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --For the Appellant : Mr. Sahay Gaurav Piyush, Advocate For the Respondent : A.P.P.
5/11.12.2019 Mr. Sahay Gaurav Piyush, learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw this appeal, as the appellant has already been died.
Permission is accorded. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending I.A. also stands disposed of.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J)
R. Shekhar Cp 3
Keshav Narayan Banerjee
The State of Jharkhand through Vigilance
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court