The court disposed of two combined Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions following an agreed settlement. The parties undertook to go together from the court premises, leading to the termination of the petitions without detailed reasoning.
Both Crl. M.P.s are disposed of as the parties have agreed to a settlement and will go together from the court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No.343 of 2019
Snehlata Mahakud … Petitioner
Versus
------
Sudhir Narayan Behera … Petitioner
Versus
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Gouri Devi, Advocate (In Cr.M.P.343/2019) Mr. A.K. Das, Advocate (In Cr.M.P.318/2019) For the State : Addl. P.P.
------
Order No.05 Dated- 08.03.2019
The petitioner of Cr.M.P. No. 343 of 2019 and Cr.M.P. No.318 of 2019 are present in person in the Court today.
It is agreed to between the parties that the parties will go together from the court itself today. In view of the settlement between the parties, both the Cr.M.P. are disposed of.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )
Animesh/
Snehlata Mahakud
The State of Jharkhand
Sudhir Narayan Behera
The State of Jharkhand
Anil Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
